Welcome to the forum!
I'm not sure if I completely understand. When I follow the steps, the duplicated group does have the linked offset still linked and the text is still linked and flowed into frame. I'm using 0.92.2 on Windows.
I think there's an option in the preferences somewhere, to relink clones when being copied, maybe that will work here, too?
Edit -> Preferences... -> Behaviour -> Clones -> Duplicating original+clones/linked offset -> Relink duplicated clones
Negora, for Inkscape, the term 'node' is already 'in use', as it's the specific word for the nodes that make up the paths. (I know you mean XML nodes, but can you please rather use the term 'object' or 'path' - that will make it a lot easier for people to understand you).
Your example shows just what I mean. But I would like that the duplicated offset were re-linked to the duplicated shape automatically, instead of keeping the link to the original one.
Just to clarify, I've attached one example from me to this message. I've left, out of the drawing, the text that flows into the frame. To simplify the example. Indeed, I should have done that from the beginning to avoid confusion. But I thought that, if I described the whole picture (that I want to draw a diagram), there might be a better solution for my problem.
Would you consider this a bug? I mean: the fact that the flowed text isn't relinked, even although I've marked the option in PreferencesI guess it depends on your perspective whether re-linking the text would be a bug or feature request. Oh look! Already reported: https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1433130
Food for possible workarounds, depending on what you're intending to do with your drawing:
Is it necessary for the text to stay editable? Is it necessary for the text to be flowed text?
If you clone a group, you can always later exchange elements within the group.
As for the cloning/bug question:
So, do I understand correctly that your structure is:
Group >
Shape >
Dynamic/Linked (?) Offset of Shape >
Text flowed into frame using Offset as frame
?
(rather unusual setup, I think - but that's one more reason why there may be bugs)
And if you clone this, what is the issue you see?
Oh gosh, it's a new option for 0.92.2
So if the clones option doesn't work out for some reason, you could avoid the linked offset by just using a regular path. Unless it's doing something else that I don't recognize? And also, it sounds like you could use Copy/Paste, to keep the text linked properly?
I think I might ask some of my questions on the mailing list - like why clones and not duplicates
I'm using 0.92.1, from the Debian repositories. That bug report seems to say that it's fixed in 0.92.2 (backported from 0.93). However, you're using 0.92.2 and are also experiencing the same bug, Right? So, Isn't it fixed in 0.92.2
Can you do a quick search in the reports over at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape to see if this one has already been reported, and create one (please including your last picture and an example svg file that will make it easy to reproduce) if there isn't one yet (or if you can't find it)?
The good news is that that 'shape-padding' property works totally fine in Inkscape 0.92.2 and in the development version:
Thank you, negora. Yes, to me that is a bug.
Can you do a quick search in the reports over at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape to see if this one has already been reported, and create one (please including your last picture and an example svg file that will make it easy to reproduce) if there isn't one yet (or if you can't find it)?
As for the inner margin aka padding, people were thinking about it already: http://tavmjong.free.fr/blog/?p=938 (Tav is a member of the W3C SVG working group - but SVG2 is somehow in an unclear state at the moment - at least to me) and https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/text.html#TextShapePadding
The good news is that that 'shape-padding' property works totally fine in Inkscape 0.92.2 and in the development version:
The bug that was fixed is that when linked offsets are cloned, the offsets are re-linked to the cloned original path (not the original or parent path). So that's what you want, partly anyway.
The bug that still seems to be happening, is when we duplicate. That's the question I want to ask the mailing list - why was this only fixed for clones and not duplicates. It seems to me like duplicates should also be re-linked.
negora, if you don't want to become involved with bug reports, I'll be glad to post it. But otherwise, please feel free :)
Yes, post it, please ;) Although I'm used to fill bug reports (I'm a programmer), you know better than me about Inkscape and other errors similar to this one. I wouldn't be able to include as much information as you would do, of course. Thank you!