I found a logo using this effect.

In the words "BADMINTON", the top is flat and the bottom is curved. How can I create an effect similar to that one?
mystery wrote:How do I make the shape of a group of text match a particular bend (…) In the words "BADMINTON", the top is flat and the bottom is curved. How can I create an effect similar to that one?
druban wrote:I would like to point out that the path effects method of envelope deformation is vastly superior to the envelope extension
The logo in my first example has '[ ] Enable left and right paths' unchecked.druban wrote:if you don't want the curving sides when you deform something using Path effects just uncheck the box that says "enable right and left side ...". Bingo - absolutely straight sides - at least it works for me that way.
druban wrote:The envelope extension requires the control box to be drawn in a certain order that never seems to be the one I use...
Code: Select all
1---2
|
|
4---3
druban wrote:maybe you can tell me what I am doing wrong in this sequence! I am sure it is something simple...
prkos wrote:If I remember correctly the first node should be bottom left.
llogg wrote:The problem is the order and direction of the nodes on the path that the text has been converted to. For some reason, probably related to the original font, the nodes go in a different order than the extension anticipates. If you draw the envelope quadrilateral in the following order: bottom left-bottom right-top right-top left, you should get the result you're after.
of course ;)llogg wrote:did you use the .svg file druban uploaded?
Please see my earlier comment: the unexpected displacement of the 'enveloped' paths in Druban's examples is caused by misinterpreting the 'transform' attributes ofllogg wrote:when I do it from scratch I cannot reproduce his issue, (…)
Maybe you duplicated and moved the path or moved it just a nodge forcing Inkscape to rewrite the path data and convert preserved path transforms into optimized transforms (i.e. transforms are directly applied to the coordinates of the nodes and no longer stored as explicit 'transfom' attribute)?llogg wrote:Just checked, did not do reverse path first.
unless he has explicitly changed the Inkscape preferences to store transforms preserved and not optimized.
But how Druban managed to get it in both his files I haven't figured out yet
nope. just opened it and did the effect the way i described.~suv wrote:Maybe you duplicated and moved the path or moved it just a nodge forcing Inkscape to rewrite the path data and convert preserved path transforms into optimized transforms (i.e. transforms are directly applied to the coordinates of the nodes and no longer stored as explicit 'transfom' attribute)?