Hi everyone, I am new member here.
For what it's worth, I have translated and fixed the Output Pro plugin to work with Inkscape 0.92.3. You can find it here:
This is great news!
I would like to express my gratitude to you for reviving an old extension (although i haven't used it before). I think many will find it beneficial.
I have done some simple testing with it and can confirm that it's worked, but with some minor problems on my low end system. However for basic cmyk jpeg conversion, this is more than perfect!
Really hope if it could export to pdf at least in the future. And the crop mark is working too provided that "Accurate color handling" option is checked. It's just that the more reasonable mark size should be there as default numbers. The current value of 5" is too big.
how much do we need CMYK export these days?
Actually this is the reason that made me want to register here. Somehow, I feel like I need to give my opinion on this question. Hopefully you don't mind.
First, I have to say that I agree with your point on CMYK export. From what I read recently on ECI website, they even encourage any design works in digital media to be done in RGB all the way, and the cmyk conversion would be done only on the final printing output file and the task could even be delegated to the printing shops. However, the latest ICC profiles should be used i.e. eciRGBv2 and eciCMYK to ensure good conversion (from what i understand after reading the article there, and i could be wrong).
On the other hand, many designers (the old timer specifically) have a different workflow. They would like to set things up in cmyk from the beginning all the way to printing. This is what Inkscape is lacking IMHO and the reasons for many to treat this software as freeware instead of free/open source software. The problem comes when these old timer are teaching new designers to use their workflow as the only way of doing things. Anything different will be considered unprofessional according to them. Anything non A**be product is non-pro to them.
While the above statement may sounds like a preference matter, it contributes to future conflict such as when a design work is transferred from client to different designers. Some might expect the source file to be in CMYK already, and if it's not they may consider it as extra work and may charge additional cost to client.
So my point is, regardless what the latest ISO standard is, the "designers" will still decide their "own standard" even if it's non conforming the ISO. Therefore, as what @brynn said on the persistent requests, i think it's important for Inkscape to have better CMYK support. While i don't think the developer will go into this CMYK route since they want to stick with "SVG native software" motto, 3rd party CMYK-related extensions are always welcomed.
What frustrated me the most is when we have all the open source library related to printing and stuffs, but it's here and there, not in 1 place and no reliable GUI based extensions to fully utilised these libraries. Well, i know we have other software like Scribus and Krita (my preferred workflow for cmyk), but for some people they may want to have everything in one software.
P.S: Sorry for the long first post