I went ahead and made these last few messages from the other topic, into their own topic.
In Inkscape, Pattern fills are a very different thing than Pattern Along Path. Patterns are typically used to fill an object, while pattern along path places the same outline object along a specific path. One is about fills and the other is about outlines repeated along a path. (Well, usually it's about outlines repeated, but there's also the stretch option.)
A pattern fill is raster in nature. It can be used to fill a vector shape or path. Pattern along path is all vector. After you create your pattern along path, and you convert it back to a regular path (Object to Path) you could then apply a pattern fill to the individual units of the PAP. That's the only way I could conceive using them together.
Pattern to Object will have no effect on pattern along path. Although it might be similar to what you describe as "expanding". I'm not entirely clear what you mean. If you want to edit a pattern, then you have to use Pattern to Object. It probably will turn into a rectangle, and it might not be in the same place on the canvas. Most of the time it shifts to the top-left corner of the page (turn on the page border to find it, if necessary) but sometimes it returns to the place on the canvas, where it was when you first converted it to a pattern.
Sorry, I think I am confused, for Bending and Stretching a shape to follow a path -- is this like creating a custom Brush?
Yes. Eventually, I think developers are planning (or at least they were) on calling them brushes, and greatly expanding the available "stock" "brushes". I was trying to convince them not to use the word "brush" because a brush from a raster program works very, very differently from the way Inkscape or other vector programs create a similar effect. I was hoping they could come up with some word to indicate a vector brush (even "vector brush" would be ok with me). My concern about it, is that I spend all my time explaining why developers do what they do, and how to make it work. And frankly, they don't have to worry about explaining it over and over again.
You could use Tiled Clones for this, if the "path" would follow a regular formula. And if you have enough patience to sort out the Shift tab of that dialog (it only works in percent, not any other units). If you're a math whiz, you might like it. I tend to use the Scatter extension more than PAP. It doesn't have as much distortion of the pattern, as pap does. Plus, I think it can use imported raster images. And the Spray tool could be considered in the same ballpark, but not if any sort of precision is needed.
Patterns:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/MANUAL/html/Attributes-Fill-Stroke.html#Attributes-PatternsPAP extension:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/MANUAL/html/Extensions-GenerateFromPath.html#Extensions-PatternAlongPathPAP LPE:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/MANUAL/html/Paths-LivePathEffects-PatternAlongPath.htmlmanual:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/MANUAL/html/index.phpOops, Lazur posted while I was typing. Here's the manual info for markers:
http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/MANUAL/html/Attributes-Stroke.html#Attributes-Stroke-Markers